One Pleases Me, The Other Confuses Me
but it is pretty heady stuff!! ;)
Well a hearty congratulations to all those who found out they matched today! Yay!
- The ports weren't U.S. owned to begin with. Are any of them?? So the national security argument may be valid but it isn't well-grounded... unless of course we conflate Arab-ness with security issues. And Lord knows we wouldn't want to do that, now would we?
DP World honcho H. Edward Bilkey made it clear in a statement that "DP World will not suffer economic loss" by shedding the New York City Passenger Ship Terminal in the W. 50s and ports in Newark, Baltimore, Philadelphia, New Orleans and Miami.
Now I'm not always the swiftest of souls to be sure, but I am clearly missing something here. What in that last brief quote from Norcross indicates that we can scratch Halliburton off the list, so to speak? This is a serious epidemic, namely, journalists taking corporation assertions as Gospel According to The Flying Spaghetti Monster...or at least gospel anyway.So, said Rep. Vito Fossella (R-S.I.), "The fundamental question is this: Who are operations being transferred to?"
DP World did not say. And scratch Halliburton off the list.
Melissa Norcross, a spokeswoman for the controversial U.S. company once headed by Vice President Cheney, called suggestions circulating on the Hill that they might take over "false and baseless."
"because of the strong relationship between the United Arab Emirates and the United States and to preserve that relationship, DP World has decided to transfer fully the US operation of P&O Operations North America to a United States entity."
I love it when you go down on me. But soon as I start to feel it gettin good, you go back up. I hate you!...
DAMN GAS PRICES!